Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:50:50 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: this breaks builds of head on stable/9 (Re: svn commit: r257268 - head/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld Message-ID: <20131103045050.B41B15807E@chaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <20131101221532.GA45336@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh3LA%2Buk6RQg5a6QHAEedEZPZ=RUbLCZ1ZqFvNNi3EAAg@mail.gmail.com> <20131101020924.GB32951@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20131101061842.GA8911@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20131101204848.GA44088@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20131101213254.GA35505@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20131101221532.GA45336@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:15:32 -0500, Brooks Davis writes: >(In practice WITHOUT_BMAKE is broken and corrupts your object tree with a >make that fails until manually deleted.) That's new? it worked last time I checked - which was around the time I made sure the make thus built was named for the flavor (fmake or bmake) desired so wouldn't accidentally be used when you change your mind. >We should decide if it should be fixed or removed before 10 goes out. AFAIK I committed workarounds for all the functional differences that worried people, before 10 was branched. So perhaps WITHOUT_BMAKE can be deprecated.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131103045050.B41B15807E>