Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 14:49:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194910] New: [PATCH] Mention svnlite(1) in Makefile.inc1, make.conf(5) and build(7) Message-ID: <bug-194910-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194910 Bug ID: 194910 Summary: [PATCH] Mention svnlite(1) in Makefile.inc1, make.conf(5) and build(7) Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Documentation Assignee: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Reporter: info@juanmolina.eu Created attachment 149222 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149222&action=edit Patch for adding svnlite(1) to Makefile.inc1, make.conf(5) and build(7) There seems to be an inconsistency with svnlite(1). The initial commit (r251886) says that it was included for checking out and committing source. Nevertheless, the make.conf man page says, in the SVN_UPDATE section, that no subversion client is included in the base system, and indeed 'make update' does not work by default, as it searches for /usr/local/bin/svn. I have attached a naive patch which replaces svn(1) by svnlite(1) in the build(7) and make.conf(5) pages, as well as the path to svnlite(1) in Makefile.inc1. In Makefile.inc1, it would be nice to account for the possibility of an user setting WITH_SVN in src.conf(5) and thus obtaining a 'svn' binary instead of 'svnlite', but I'm not competent enough to do this properly. If the idea of this patch is accepted, I think we should also consider resolving #194080. Hope it helps, Juan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194910-9>