Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:10:56 +0400 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: incorrect dependency registration? Message-ID: <C3D53680-CC48-432A-B467-F527EF0FBB33@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140929080109.GI40373@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <15E556C8-EEB6-4218-93F3-F76BFA2E4F29@FreeBSD.org> <20140929080109.GI40373@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 сент. 2014 г., at 12:01, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:52:50AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am using FreeBSD-10/stable and pkg-1.3.8. >> >> Consider py-dateutil port, it depends on py-six. >> >> First, I installed py33-dateutil (with py33-six), for python3. >> >> Now I install py-dateutil for python2. Upon installation, I get the following waring: >> ===> Installing for py27-dateutil-2.2 >> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-six>0 - found >> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found >> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found >> ===> Checking if py27-dateutil already installed >> ===> Registering installation for py27-dateutil-2.2 >> pkg-static: py27-dateutil-2.2: duplicate dependency listing: py33-six-1.5.2, ignoring >> >> When I try to deinstall py27-six, I get: >> >> # pkg delete py27-six >> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) >> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 3 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): >> >> Installed packages to be REMOVED: >> py27-six-1.8.0 >> py33-dateutil-2.1_3 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) >> py27-dateutil-2.2 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) >> >> The operation will free 1 MB. >> >> Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: >> >> (it wants to deinstall both versions of py-dateutil). >> >> Something looks broken here. >> >> Some time ago it did not let to install the same port for different python version, now it is possible but deps registration looks broken. > > I do not have time for this right now, I'll see in a couple of days, but CCing > parties that should be interested :) > Can you reproduce this or is this a problem on my side? Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C3D53680-CC48-432A-B467-F527EF0FBB33>