Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192937] [New Port] sysutils/consul Message-ID: <bug-192937-13-gRgruxZe1O@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-192937-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-192937-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192937 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Bartelmess <thomas@bartelmess.io> --- Hi, sorry for those mistakes this is my first submission to the ports tree. I have one follow up question. When the port has a dependency that is not in the ports tree, should the dependency be a separate submission or combined with the existing. (In reply to John Marino from comment #4) > Thanks! Do you have any verification available? In order of preference, > examples of what I'm looking for are: > > 1) "poudriere testport" or "poudriere bulk -t" logs > 2) Redports or tinderbox logs > 3) "make check-plist" followed by "make stage-qa" output > (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html) > > Also, please run "portlint" and paste the output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192937-13-gRgruxZe1O>