Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:44:09 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] kern/kern_timeout.c rewrite in progress Message-ID: <54B29A49.3080600@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <CAAAm0r39Sv3TCvwaCiNQ1Y9iBVtY_nb0A_iNOC41bgxqXmt%2B4w@mail.gmail.com> References: <54A1B38C.1000709@selasky.org> <20150101005613.4f788b0c@nonamehost.local> <54A49CA5.2060801@selasky.org> <54A4A002.8010802@selasky.org> <54A53F4F.2000003@selasky.org> <54A92ED1.2070906@selasky.org> <CAJ-Vmo=tc-hqykhyc5bQW8qd_34PZU6yfGY8wziByA0xnR3ANQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A9A71E.70609@selasky.org> <CAAAm0r39Sv3TCvwaCiNQ1Y9iBVtY_nb0A_iNOC41bgxqXmt%2B4w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/07/15 00:10, Jason Wolfe wrote: > > Hans, > > We've been running into 'spin lock held too long' panics in the kernel > idle threads on 10-STABLE over the past 6 months, so I was interested > to see your work here in the callout code. I went ahead and brought > this patch back to a recent 10.1-STABLE base without much issue, > kern_timeout.c was actually the only piece with some easily resolvable > rejections. > > I've had a box running stable under load with this patch for a few > days, and 10 more have just been added to the rotation. Anyway just > figured you might be interested in the some feedback while the changes > are reviewed. > Hi, Thank your for testing this patch. Any updates? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B29A49.3080600>