Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:59:31 +0300 From: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Wilcox <AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com> Cc: 'Jilles Tjoelker' <jilles@stack.nl>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Added utimensat(2) to Linuxulator (was RE: Current status of utimensat(2)) Message-ID: <20150222085931.GA13515@dchagin.static.corbina.net> In-Reply-To: <004f01d03d34$3caed970$b60c8c50$@Wilcox-Tech.com> References: <004f01d03d34$3caed970$b60c8c50$@Wilcox-Tech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 02:59:34AM -0600, Andrew Wilcox wrote: > Jilles Tjoelker sent 29 January 2015 17:06: > > I committed utimensat/futimens to head. I also made a start at Linuxulator > > utimensat, see attached patch. Please complete it and test it. > > > > -- > > Jilles Tjoelker > > > I have merged some of the things Jilles' patch does into the patch I was already working on. I have tested a number of corner cases with it, and compared the results to a running Linux system. I have also run software which all use utimensat(2) on Linux, such as recent tar(1), touch(1), and Python 3.3's shutil library, inside the Linuxulator with this patch applied. I have found this patch's behaviour to be correct in these tests. Please let me know of any comments or issues. > > I will be additionally trying to merge this into dchagin's lemul branch, but that discussion will take place on Phabricator (and will involve testing on amd64-native Linuxulator, which I have not yet done). > I commited your patch to the lemul branch with small style(9) modifications. for now lemul is up-to-date, please, test. -- Have fun! chd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150222085931.GA13515>