Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 07:28:42 GMT From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Aud=C3=A9oud?= <jadawin@tuxaco.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unmaintained perl ports Message-ID: <1430638123219.22e2dbb414dce8@mozgaia> References: <EA129229-7012-4367-A026-9908981E01CA@adamw.org> <0C12C7BEDEE81EACF88E7E9D@atuin.in.mat.cc>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mathieu Arnold a écrit : > +--On 2 mai 2015 09:21:54 -0600 Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: > | Hi everyone, > | > | What's our perspective on perl ports maintained by perl@? For the most > | part, those ports don't get updated or improved very often. I tend only > | to scan portscout for perl@ ports. > | > | I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl@. What do you think > | of that idea? > > I wanted to do that for some time now, I just had not gotten around to it > :-)> -- > Mathieu Arnold if i remember correctly some perl@ people had a discussion about it on irc and no decision has been taken because some was ok and other were not. Personally i agree to switch thoses ports to perl@ -- Philippe Audéoudhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1430638123219.22e2dbb414dce8>