Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:28:08 -0700 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE? Message-ID: <7C577F5B-545C-4D70-A78E-A19E35A24592@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mergemaster [as an example] has code like:
> # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more
. . .
> MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR}/share/mk"
> ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} distrib-dirs >/dev/null
> ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${TEMPROOT} distrib-dirs >/dev/null &&
> ${MM_MAKE} _obj SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=etc >/dev/null &&
> ${MM_MAKE} everything SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=etc >/dev/null &&
> ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${TEMPROOT} distribution >/dev/null;} ||
. . .
If one is using WITH_META_MODE= for buildworld, buidlkernel, installkernel, installworld what is appropriate for scripts or other uses of make for other makefile-targets?
Are there explicit mixes of using WITH_META_MODE= for some makefile targets and not using WITH_META_MODE= for other makefile targets that need to be avoided? Does one need to force some scripts to use [or not use] WITH_META_MODE= for their "internal" make usage?
===
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7C577F5B-545C-4D70-A78E-A19E35A24592>