Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 05:04:34 +0000 From: Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com> To: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>, Yuval Bason <yuvalba@mellanox.com>, "'freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hanss@mellanox.com> Subject: RE: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? Message-ID: <DB5PR05MB1765DA2CF65FA800E599583CC3610@DB5PR05MB1765.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <a4c61c6804564b8eabdc3ef2aeee1eef@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <4C75517F-4EA4-4B42-833D-F43094E9DAD3@postgresql.org> <677214B0-6A92-42AA-A7B3-D125CB826761@jnielsen.net> <C53BDEDA-D541-44E9-893C-F249DCDD484C@postgresql.org> <E1A5C9B8-4EA5-4146-BB83-544E72A2FC11@postgresql.org>, <7BB80C17-897C-40B2-9731-A750A9EDD290@postgresql.org> <3185e0b5eb704dfc99c65aaed07eb215@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DB5PR05MB1765932C2939B1CDA6E21A4CC36F0@DB5PR05MB1765.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <E4AD6133-00BC-469A-9055-32815B7EC3E0@postgresql.org> <a4c61c6804564b8eabdc3ef2aeee1eef@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,=20 As for 9.x, no problem stating them as "No".=20 -Meny -----Original Message----- From: freebsd-commits-tracker=20 Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 7:25 PM To: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>; Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com>; Yuv= al Bason <yuvalba@mellanox.com> Subject: FW: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.orgOn Behalf OfJustin Clift Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 4:25:06 PM (UTC) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: Meny Yossefi Cc: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org; Yuval Bason; Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? On 22 Apr 2016, at 15:52, Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com> wrote: <snip> > Here's an updated list: Thanks Meny, that's excellent. :) Transcribed it to the table here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/InfiniBand For the "N/A" entries - newer hardware on FreeBSD 9.x - would it be ok to j= ust have them as "No"? Am thinking it would help keep things mentally simp= le for people to process that way. eg "Yes", "No", "Not Yet" are all straight forward answers. "N/A" instead can raise questions, as people have to try and figure what "N/A" means in this context. Workable? :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who = work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first gr= oup; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi _______________________________________________ freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailm= an/listinfo/freebsd-infiniband To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-infiniband-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB5PR05MB1765DA2CF65FA800E599583CC3610>