Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 05:04:34 +0000 From: Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com> To: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>, Yuval Bason <yuvalba@mellanox.com>, "'freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hanss@mellanox.com> Subject: RE: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? Message-ID: <DB5PR05MB1765DA2CF65FA800E599583CC3610@DB5PR05MB1765.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <a4c61c6804564b8eabdc3ef2aeee1eef@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <4C75517F-4EA4-4B42-833D-F43094E9DAD3@postgresql.org> <677214B0-6A92-42AA-A7B3-D125CB826761@jnielsen.net> <C53BDEDA-D541-44E9-893C-F249DCDD484C@postgresql.org> <E1A5C9B8-4EA5-4146-BB83-544E72A2FC11@postgresql.org>, <7BB80C17-897C-40B2-9731-A750A9EDD290@postgresql.org> <3185e0b5eb704dfc99c65aaed07eb215@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DB5PR05MB1765932C2939B1CDA6E21A4CC36F0@DB5PR05MB1765.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <E4AD6133-00BC-469A-9055-32815B7EC3E0@postgresql.org> <a4c61c6804564b8eabdc3ef2aeee1eef@AMSPR05MB0580.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi, As for 9.x, no problem stating them as "No". -Meny -----Original Message----- From: freebsd-commits-tracker Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 7:25 PM To: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>; Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com>; Yuval Bason <yuvalba@mellanox.com> Subject: FW: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.orgOn Behalf OfJustin Clift Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 4:25:06 PM (UTC) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: Meny Yossefi Cc: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org; Yuval Bason; Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: Table of supported IB hw per FreeBSD version? On 22 Apr 2016, at 15:52, Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com> wrote: <snip> > Here's an updated list: Thanks Meny, that's excellent. :) Transcribed it to the table here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/InfiniBand For the "N/A" entries - newer hardware on FreeBSD 9.x - would it be ok to just have them as "No"? Am thinking it would help keep things mentally simple for people to process that way. eg "Yes", "No", "Not Yet" are all straight forward answers. "N/A" instead can raise questions, as people have to try and figure what "N/A" means in this context. Workable? :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi _______________________________________________ freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-infiniband To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-infiniband-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB5PR05MB1765DA2CF65FA800E599583CC3610>