Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Nov 2016 08:35:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 214633] Open symlink with O_NOFOLLOW should fail with ELOOP, not EMLINK
Message-ID:  <bug-214633-15-YL4VVyfdRw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-214633-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-214633-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214633

Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kib@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Jilles Tjoelker from comment #1)
IMO the frequency of the issue raised, and the need of the appearance of the
carrier of the tribal knowledge who can explain the consequences of the change,
make it more reasonable to put this reasoning into the open(2) page.

Jilles, would you, please, formulate your explanation to either BUGS or
STANDARDS section of the man page ?  It would be very useful for now, and even
if both us and SUSvX adjust the behaviour, a historic reference is useful for
very long time.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214633-15-YL4VVyfdRw>