Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 08:35:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214633] Open symlink with O_NOFOLLOW should fail with ELOOP, not EMLINK Message-ID: <bug-214633-15-YL4VVyfdRw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-214633-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-214633-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214633 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kib@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jilles Tjoelker from comment #1) IMO the frequency of the issue raised, and the need of the appearance of the carrier of the tribal knowledge who can explain the consequences of the cha= nge, make it more reasonable to put this reasoning into the open(2) page. Jilles, would you, please, formulate your explanation to either BUGS or STANDARDS section of the man page ? It would be very useful for now, and e= ven if both us and SUSvX adjust the behaviour, a historic reference is useful f= or very long time. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214633-15-YL4VVyfdRw>