Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) To: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org, freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org, gnn@neville-neil.com Subject: Re: DTrace issues? Message-ID: <20170212191826.5599A45EA@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <3CEE1970-719B-42D1-A95A-FEAD3F375A30@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"George Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm told that the reason we don't have a firefox package is due to > DTrace. "firefox" package was masked on 12.0-CURRENT for 1 week due 2 regressions since then fixed. Other FreeBSD release are unaffected. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313504 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433889 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433904 > If so, please point me at active bugs in this area. Firefox is affected by a few more DTrace issues but those are old and have been worked around in the ports tree. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214556 # dtrace on aarch64 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1041353 # dtrace vs. ld.gold https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702179 # dtrace vs. static libs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170212191826.5599A45EA>