Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:26:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 218571] umtx compat6 regression affecting 'jar' command
Message-ID:  <bug-218571-16-LZDaBez5Qw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-218571-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-218571-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218571

--- Comment #6 from Nicholas Hardison <nicholas.hardison@gmail.com> ---
I believe I have a new patch, with the syscalls marked as COMPAT6 instead of
STD, and without the libc changes, and my test case binary seems to work!

On the UMUTEX_ERROR_CHECK definition - on my 8.2-RELEASE systems, it looks =
like
it is being used in error handling for the functions in kern/kern_umtx.c, s=
o I
don't think I should get rid of it.  I could try and remove it, or does that
mean it should be marked compat8 instead of compat6?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-218571-16-LZDaBez5Qw>