Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 15:20:49 +0100 From: peter.blok@bsd4all.org To: Jon Brawn <jon@brawn.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: INTRNG Message-ID: <694A18B8-60FB-48C8-AE63-C63250F6D940@bsd4all.org> In-Reply-To: <401A33BD-F3AE-4139-9D47-6F85C8333022@brawn.org> References: <401A33BD-F3AE-4139-9D47-6F85C8333022@brawn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
While on the subject INTRNG - does anybody know the status of handling = GPIO interrupts with queue/kevent? There were some patches before INTRNG, but they require some work. Peter > On 23 Feb 2018, at 07:25, Jon Brawn <jon@brawn.org> wrote: >=20 > Wotcha Gang! >=20 > In my travels through the arm64 GENERIC config file I came across the = option =E2=80=98INTRNG=E2=80=99, and wondered what it was: >=20 > INTeRrupt Next Generation? > INTeger Random Number Generator? > IN TRaiNinG? > INTerrupt Random Number Generator? > INdependent TRaiNinG? >=20 > So, please put me out of my misery, what does INTRNG stand for, and = what are its implications when selected vs not selected? >=20 > Cheers! >=20 > Jon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?694A18B8-60FB-48C8-AE63-C63250F6D940>