Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:34:36 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226688] [ipfw] rejects adding 255.255.255.255 to a table Message-ID: <bug-226688-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226688 Bug ID: 226688 Summary: [ipfw] rejects adding 255.255.255.255 to a table Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: de0u+fbbugs@andrew.cmu.edu Adding 255.255.255.255/32 to an ipfw table results in "Invalid argument". This is a freshly-installed 11.1-RELEASE system: FreeBSD kiki0 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE #0 r321309: Fri Jul 21 04:10:47 UTC 2017 root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Repeat by: ********************************************************************** root@kiki0:/usr/local/etc # ipfw /dev/stdin table 30 create type addr algo addr:radix table 30 add 255.255.255.254/32 added: 255.255.255.254/32 0 table 30 add 255.255.255.255/32 error: 255.255.255.255/32 0 Line 3: Adding record failed: Invalid argument root@kiki0:/usr/local/etc # ipfw /dev/stdin table 30 list --- table(30), set(0) --- 255.255.255.254/32 0 table 30 detail --- table(30), set(0) --- kindex: 3, type: addr references: 0, valtype: legacy algorithm: addr:radix items: 1, size: 416 IPv4 algorithm radix info items: 1 itemsize: 72 IPv6 algorithm radix info items: 0 itemsize: 76 table 30 destroy ^D root@kiki0:/usr/local/etc # ********************************************************************** See also bug #180731 -- it's hard not to suspect that there is a tendency toward confusion between -1 as an error code and 255.255.255.255, which has the same bit pattern (at least on 32-bit machines). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226688-8>