Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 07:13:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201623] /usr/ports/graphics/dri fails on powerpc Message-ID: <bug-201623-21-GeOVGoTT2D@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201623-21@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201623-21@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201623 --- Comment #13 from Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> --- First of all, sorry for inadvertent confusion, GCC situation is not as bad = on powerpc as on sparc64. I've had GCC version downgraded on powerpc not beca= use it was broken (I never tried), but because I generally prefer lower versions due to less code bloat, and because I already had gcc-4.9.4.tar.gz2 distfile downloaded (and they are pretty big). Niclas, for now, I had to modify /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk by h= and. Eventually, after I iron out remaining issues with gcc48/49 under sparc64 = (it could never finish the build for me under QEMU with BOOSTRAP option enabled, which is the default, so it needs to be flipped), I'd probably submit a pat= ch to set appropriate GCC default version based on particular architecture; th= is would most likely be applicable to sparc64 and /maybe/ powerpc. That said, I'll rebuild `graphics/mesa-dri' with default gcc version (6?) on powerpc and report again. Mark, sorry, I was thinking of sparc64; both gcc5/6 are marked as broken on= it currently. They probably build fine on powerpc, I just haven't tried yet. [I cannot say much about system-clang, I'm quite happy with gcc 4.2 as a sy= stem compiler. In fact, that what makes tier-2 architectures more attractive to= me now: they don't use clang.] --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201623-21-GeOVGoTT2D>