Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 19:40:30 -0700 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: head -r335799 -> -r335812: "Not bootstrapping a cross-compiler" vs. "libclang will be built for bootstrapping a cross-linker": both being reported together Message-ID: <A287C4A5-9BAF-45F3-BBA1-B27EA7DCBC9D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5C884C99-73A7-4967-92AD-212213ACA69A@yahoo.com> References: <38AFEE6E-C4C9-4827-AC99-B48DADE95277@yahoo.com> <5C884C99-73A7-4967-92AD-212213ACA69A@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 23:32, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 2018-Jun-29, at 10:45 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: >>=20 >> Going from -r335799 to -r335812 buildworld buildkernel reported: >>=20 >> --- buildworld --- >> make[1]: "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1" line 342: SYSTEM_COMPILER: Determined t= hat CC=3Dcc matches the source tree. Not bootstrapping a cross-compiler. >> make[1]: "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1" line 349: SYSTEM_LINKER: libclang will b= e built for bootstrapping a cross-linker. Note it says right here that libclang will be built for the linker. So I=E2=80=99m not sure what you=E2=80=99re reporting here. >>=20 >> and later did: >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvm (all) >> Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-too= ls/lib/clang/libllvm/X86GenAsmWriter.inc >> Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-too= ls/lib/clang/libllvm/X86GenAsmWriter1.inc >> . . . >=20 > and: >=20 > --- libllvm.a --- > building static llvm library > --- all_subdir_lib/clang/libclang --- > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libclang (all) > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/lib/clang/libclang/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/lib/clang/libclang/clang/AST/AttrVisitor.inc > . . . > =3D=3D=3D> usr.bin/clang/lld (obj,all,install) > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/Options.inc > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/Common/TargetOptionsCommandFlags.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/Driver.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/DriverUtils.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/InputFiles.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/LTO.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ELF/ScriptParser.o > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ld.lld.full > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ld.lld.debug > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/ld.lld > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/_proginstall > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/obj-tool= s/usr.bin/clang/lld/_installlinks > . . . >=20 > I guess it just looked odd to me that needing to rebuild libclang did > not imply needing to rebuild the compiler but only lld. >=20 > It is doing similarly for: >=20 > --- lib__L --- > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/li= bllvm/X86GenGlobalISel.inc > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/li= bllvm/X86GenInstrInfo.inc > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/li= bllvm/X86GenRegisterBank.inc > Building /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/li= bllvm/X86GenRegisterInfo.inc > . . . >=20 > (I'll note that jumping from -r335245 to -r335799 also rebuilt such things= > and more, as expected for an llvm version update. -r335799 to -r335812 is > less obvious.) >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A287C4A5-9BAF-45F3-BBA1-B27EA7DCBC9D>