Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:59:24 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Filippo Moretti <filippomore@yahoo.com>
To:        FreeBSD Stable ML <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: Undefined symbol "environ" (RPI/arm64)
Message-ID:  <1252756970.4179337.1551009564377@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4357EC8-3D7C-4918-A046-9D4681608328@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CALvFMRys9oKvCTF7JR=1X81d9G1wFZtCy6Gov2uPuCDGkX=-FA@mail.gmail.com> <d8dfd071-9703-521c-6073-4641c372a926@sentry.org> <3BB1A8CA-272D-4B48-81A2-CBAF7EE23507@gmail.com> <20181227140706.748bf173@ernst.home> <201901060714.x067DqZP016183@fire.js.berklix.net> <20190106130206.56332774@ernst.home> <201901062231.x06MV3OP028712@fire.js.berklix.net> <201901071626.x07GPtW6049111@fire.js.berklix.net> <1550913614539-0.post@n6.nabble.com> <a7im-wlna-wny@FreeBSD.org> <E4357EC8-3D7C-4918-A046-9D4681608328@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help 

 For what it may be worth I built it with LLVM80-RC from ports and I did not experience tis problemsincerely
Filippo

    On Saturday, February 23, 2019, 8:12:00 PM GMT+1, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:  
 
 On 23 Feb 2019, at 16:48, Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> writes:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm on FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE #0 r344261 amd64.
>> 
>> I've rebuilt all ports after clang 7 import to 12-STABLE.
>> 
>> Now I get with mplayer
>> 
>> ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libc.so.7: Undefined symbol "__progname"
> 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/490727 needs to be adjusted
> for -STABLE as well.

No, the correct solution is to fix mplayer's linker script, or better,
to delete it entirely. :-)  Afterwards, r490727 can be reverted.

-Dimitry

  
From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 25 00:19:35 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B11512E55
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au)
Received: from fish.ish.com.au (ip-2.ish.com.au [203.29.62.2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB4E8F70E
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au)
Received: from ip-145.ish.com.au ([203.29.62.145]:64858)
 by fish.ish.com.au with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
 (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <ari@ish.com.au>)
 id 1gy3zJ-000767-2y; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:19:18 +1100
X-CTCH-RefID: str01.0A090205.5C733486.0010:SCFSTAT42589845, ss=1, re=-4.000,
 recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
Subject: Re: Java support
To: Charlie Li <ml+freebsd@vishwin.info>
Cc: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <ddc30389-8d68-2168-700a-d66c6de90c79@ish.com.au>
 <20190221101815.GU2748@home.opsec.eu>
 <eb7d9cf0-3e69-531b-7b67-0bfb91a58478@ish.com.au>
 <1942e86e-8a6a-d5ca-c701-abb1036b5ee2@vishwin.info>
From: Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au>
Message-ID: <e92895be-4e5e-0196-6489-cb95257ee805@ish.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:19:16 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:66.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/66.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1942e86e-8a6a-d5ca-c701-abb1036b5ee2@vishwin.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5BB4E8F70E
X-Spamd-Bar: +
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au designates
 203.29.62.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; ENVFROM_PRVS(0.00)[];
 TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[ish.com.au]; FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.94)[0.938,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.38)[-0.379,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx.ish.com.au];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.96)[0.960,0];
 IP_SCORE(0.76)[asn: 7545(3.82), country: AU(-0.04)];
 FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[ari@ish.com.au,prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:7545, ipnet:203.29.62.0/24, country:AU];
 FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ari@ish.com.au,prvs	594c68c9=ari@ish.com.au];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:19:36 -0000

On 22/2/19 4:12pm, Charlie Li wrote:
> I don't think this is beyond the open source community's capabilities at
> all; quite the opposite. The real crux is individual priorities.


Right now there is no publicly visible work on porting Java 11 (the only
version worth working on at this time I think). Someone may step up when
it becomes important enough to them. Or not.


> Please refer to the following PR:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id"2568
>
> The last comment there is exactly the point of what I had typed in an
> earlier incarnation of this email message before I had some second
> thoughts on just how rude it could come off.


Yeah, not especially helpful. Not everyone with a need for new Java has
the technical expertise to work on something as complex as porting a
JVM. I have considerable experience working in open source communities
and I know that the right confluence of people and tasks are not always
something you can predict.

I was hoping that either the FreeBSD Foundation might step up to this
problem or else some contributors might discuss efforts happening behind
closed doors. However I do think that a lack of modern Java is going to
bite into the credibility of FreeBSD as a server platform before long.

Are the sponsors behind the AdoptOpenJDK project interested in FreeBSD
as a platform? Are there conversations happening there to try and get
FreeBSD including in their test farm? Can the FreeBSD project assist by
making servers available, especially with the rumours of Travis downsizing?

Cheers

Ari


[1] https://adoptopenjdk.net/sponsors.html

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1252756970.4179337.1551009564377>