Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 09:22:00 +0000 From: "N.J. Mann" <njm@njm.me.uk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: updating cron and atrun Message-ID: <97A66670F59C9C626B5090E3@triton.njm.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <6701.1581190231@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <CAJzSF_7N4A-_6LfjivWRirNkTHv3ANWu%2BBX6g1UOKqdYmDZZNA@mail.gmail.com> <6701.1581190231@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
On Saturday, February 08, 2020 19:30:31 +0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> Is at(1) something people actually use these days, or should it be
> disabled by default ?
I do. I use it to run various homebrew scripts in response to external
events. I needed a delay (sometime minutes, sometimes hours) between
the event and the response and at(1) was a perfect fit.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?97A66670F59C9C626B5090E3>