Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:41:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247542] math/lapack: upgrade to 3.9.0 with math/blas + math/xlapack + math/cblas Message-ID: <bug-247542-37611-PrnKd0Hnbt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-247542-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-247542-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247542 --- Comment #12 from Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to John Hein from comment #11) I'm really sorry, but I cannot reproduce the problem with the patch format. I could not even imagine how I could produce such a thing: I do not use Windows machines, my patches are produced directly on a FreeBSD workstation by `svn diff', and they are uploaded to bugzilla from the same machine, using Firefox. About ranlib, I have understood! These ports are quiet complex, and I tried to simplify them, but re-using the same parts between the different ports. And you are right, ranlib emit a warning for math/blas, but this is just a warning, and the static library is built anyways during post-build. Does'nt it produce a $PREFIX/lib/libblas.a when you make it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247542-37611-PrnKd0Hnbt>