Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:50:24 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-git@freebsd.org, "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs2svn made lots of old ports tags basically empty Message-ID: <CAPyFy2BY%2BgXc9A-J=oLh_akfb4%2BedaPE5Rd-PoTqx4To9hXL6A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ9axoTvFskmDGawUnGGMQRWmM2=PBiCghPVzE8%2B3R1P-3na3g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ9axoTvFskmDGawUnGGMQRWmM2=PBiCghPVzE8%2B3R1P-3na3g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 11:09, Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Note that it copies the root, but then deletes everything _but_ Mk. I > take it this is not what was wanted and the release tags are supposed > to ship a full tree, not just Mk? I presume so. I think we'd need to look at the CVS version of the repo to determine what happened here. I wonder if we can just skip these old tags in the conversion though? If they were already broken by cvs2svn we probably don't need them now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BY%2BgXc9A-J=oLh_akfb4%2BedaPE5Rd-PoTqx4To9hXL6A>