Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 13:49:03 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org>, git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question on (my) workflow migration svn -> git Message-ID: <CAPyFy2AfGFQJJpjKkhkUzbXPyDbPQnDuYp-H7ko3aDRcHh1sFA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20201003223531.GA77534@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20200924201715.GR1390@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200924205326.GB64154@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <CAJ9axoR=0zPxUSF-wH-ZT%2BeeHN3-ZB%2B=M6NcbWR1zKncU2m%2BKA@mail.gmail.com> <20200926020946.GK1390@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200926124212.GL92039@acme.spoerlein.net> <20201003223531.GA77534@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 18:35, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote: > > As noted earlier, that seems to have worked. However, subsequent to > your "Heads up: beta git repo hashes changing this weekend" notice, I > attempted a "git fetch" within that bare repo, and -- as I ratehr > expected, git was ... singularly unhappy about the exercise.' Indeed. Let me reiterate though that this is a consequence of fine-tuning the conversion process; once the migration is complete it should not happen again. Deleting and cloning again from scratch is a reasonable way to interact with the repository during this stage. > That is not waht I'm trying to do. I am trying to have a (separate) > working copy (for each branch I use) that persists from day to day, and > which I update from the repo shortly before I rebuild FreeBSD. For the time being I think that you'd want to remove the bare repo and worktrees, and recreate everything from scratch over a hash change.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2AfGFQJJpjKkhkUzbXPyDbPQnDuYp-H7ko3aDRcHh1sFA>