Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 08:57:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246322] ld.bfd error on releng/11.4 confuses many autoconf scripts Message-ID: <bug-246322-29464-PTD763cpkx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-246322-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-246322-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246322 --- Comment #5 from Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #4) So what shall we do here? I've gone a little bit into the rabbit hole that = is BFD ld, but the bug does not "jump out" at me. So fixing it is likely not trivial. We could: 1) Patch out the error message in BFD ld (possibly only on stable/11) 2) Spend time to figure why BFD ld is choking on this .eh_frame section, ge= t a fix, submit it upstream, merge it downstream, etc 3) Add -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to lib/csu in general 4) Add -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to lib/csu/i386 only 5) Add -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to lib/csu/i386 only, and only on stable/11 My preference would be for 5). Note that we'd need to MFS any fix to releng/11.4 too. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246322-29464-PTD763cpkx>