Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:42:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250845] www/apache24: mod_proxy_uwsgi doesn't use default port of uwsgi:// scheme. Message-ID: <bug-250845-16115-5jWZdZWcXS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-250845-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-250845-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250845 --- Comment #2 from nork@ninth-nine.com --- Hi Bernard, > Looks like there isn't something like a default port for uWSGI (at least = looking at the uWSGI docs I don't see it). Guess this is why it's not defin= ed in the code. Yes. But I don't know why. > Guess this is why it's not defined in the code. The documentation clearly= contains the port for all configurations. Perhaps makes sense to submit pa= tch to add an admonition "NOTE: You must use a port number in your ProxyPas= s" instead? That's fine, but "NOTE: You must use a port number exclude 3031 in your ProxyPass". In this time, apache24 reports a error like following setting: ProxyPass / uwsgi://127.0.0.1/ ProxyPass / uwsgi://127.0.0.1:3031/ And also, unix domain "with port number" causes a error like following sett= ing: ProxyPass / unix:/tmp/.uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://127.0.0.1:3031/ ProxyPass / unix:/tmp/.uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://127.0.0.1:3032/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-250845-16115-5jWZdZWcXS>