Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:03:04 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org> Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>, "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" <freebsd@gushi.org>, Freebsd Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection Message-ID: <D85AEAC1-C195-42F7-9158-2BF3E79F3CA7@grem.de> In-Reply-To: <5f2e07094306d7ae8dc1c98e95ee2d24@FreeBSD.org> References: <5f2e07094306d7ae8dc1c98e95ee2d24@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 8. Nov 2021, at 00:46, Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I apologize for the confusion, I tried to catch "everyone" and I've (b)cc > all maintainers that do no have a Phabricator account but since a lot of > ports are old and unassigned to I figured that I should also notify > ports@ too to avoid people missing it. Which I like, as there is always a chance that there=E2=80=99s a port one re= lies on they might want to adopt and overhaul to prevent removal. It was sim= ply the wording that caused some confusing :) Cheers & thanks for your work, Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D85AEAC1-C195-42F7-9158-2BF3E79F3CA7>