Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:03:59 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Last bits of SCCS, RCS, CVS and Subversion IDs Message-ID: <20230905160359.51C07C0@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqQRQJq2TxtxwKEgtLcAe5ENOvu2_L%2BksE1pVatyKhC-Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfqQRQJq2TxtxwKEgtLcAe5ENOvu2_L%2BksE1pVatyKhC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <CANCZdfqQRQJq2TxtxwKEgtLcAe5ENOvu2_L+ksE1pVatyKhC-Q@mail.gmail.com> , Warner Losh writes: > > So I plan on just removing the SCCS, RCS, CVS and Subversion Ids that > remain in the tree. Though I removed 32k $FreeBSD$ lines, there's about 100 > or so remaining, and a few hundred miscellaneous other IDs. I do plan on > keeping the $NetBSD$ and $OpenBSD$ lines for now, though. > > Comments? I think the NetBSD and OpenBSD lines still serve some purpose, for two reasons. 1. The OpenBSD lines still document the baseline from which a source was obtained. Not so much the NetBSD lines since they now use Mercurial. OpenBSD still uses CVS. 2. The remaining OpenBSD lines may reduce merge conflicts if they remain. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20230905160359.51C07C0>