Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 23:21:11 -0700 From: "Pat Maddox" <pat@patmaddox.com> To: "Kurt Jaeger" <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-python@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Seeking guidance on submitting several new Python-based ports Message-ID: <89c88bea-4130-4555-a36a-46d9755ad51d@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ZS-gdO5ZTdivqSnm@fc.opsec.eu> References: <02ef0f84-d0a8-43e0-a726-8eee263de515@app.fastmail.com> <ZS-gdO5ZTdivqSnm@fc.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, at 2:08 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Is it reasonable to submit several ports as part of one PR? >> For my purposes, there are a handful of "leaf" ports: > [...] > > If you add one port per PR and set the proper dependencies in each PR, > it's easy for several committers to work on those ports. Thanks! For anyone interested, here are the leaf ports (blockers are set in the PRs, there are 12 new ports total): databases/py-dbt-duckdb: DuckDB adapter plugin for dbt https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274584 databases/py-dbt-snowflake: Snowflake adapter plugin for dbt https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274583 databases/py-schemachange: Database Change Management for Snowflake https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274585 databases/py-snowddl: Object management automation for Snowflake https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274586 Pat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?89c88bea-4130-4555-a36a-46d9755ad51d>