Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-git@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: got(1) in base consideration Message-ID: <s268s3r0-1019-q049-8p33-q4q741nqpr01@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> In-Reply-To: <9f48a955-5f8a-450c-94c1-2a7d9d69ecb9@FreeBSD.org> References: <9f48a955-5f8a-450c-94c1-2a7d9d69ecb9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 May 2025, Kyle Evans wrote: > Hi, > > I've been toying around with the idea of pulling got(1) into base, but hidden > off into /usr/libexec and not supporting it for general usage. The idea would > instead be to provide a script or two as a user-facing interface to do the > bare minimum to functionally maintain a local copy of our git repos. Kind-of like csup in cvs/cvsupd times? With the difference that csup also solved a problem that cvs could not. That gets me to my question? In a time when pkg(8) will be mandatory basically to our users, what does this buy a user that it cannot do after a pkg install git-lite? The idea about the scripts is differnt thig, which may very well be valuable? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?s268s3r0-1019-q049-8p33-q4q741nqpr01>