Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 04:19:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 284054] ports-mgmt/pkg: Does not recognize .pkg as a valid suffix (triggered by portupgrade) Message-ID: <bug-284054-32340-6P36SG77Ac@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-284054-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-284054-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-pkg (Nobody) <pkg@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-feedback: Bug 284054: ports-mgmt/pkg: Does not recognize .pkg as a valid suffix (triggered by portupgrade) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D284054 --- Description --- For quite some time now (since at least FreeBSD 12, if not earlier) pkg complains about "pkg: unknown format pkg, using the default" when using portupgrade on a port. This bug could also be consider a bug in portugrade, but since both are essential parts of the "core" ports system for people who build their own ports, one or the other maintainer should be able to address this. Give that .pkg seems like a reasonable suffix for ports-mgmt/pkg to support, I'm fili= ng it against pkg. Feel free to reassign. To reproduce (on 14.2-stable), just "portupgrade -f" any port you have installed. You will see output like this: [...] =3D=3D=3D=3D> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ---> Backing up the old version pkg: unknown format pkg, using the default <-------------- ---> Uninstalling the old version [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 279 packages found - done] ---> Deinstalling 'xev-1.2.4' Updating database digests format: 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) [...]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-284054-32340-6P36SG77Ac>