Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Jun 2026 15:26:22 +0100
From:      Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com>
To:        Arnaud de Prelle <arnaud@pnzone.net>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, fernape@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nginx-1.30.2_2,3 wrongly vulnerable to CVE-2026-9256 ?
Message-ID:  <202606011426.651EQMeV018896@higson.cam.lispworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <e7252e33e7aa60c82d3a73240258d7d1@pnzone.net> (message from Arnaud de Prelle on Sun, 31 May 2026 22:01:11 %2B0200)
References:   <e7252e33e7aa60c82d3a73240258d7d1@pnzone.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[fernape@ added]

>>>>> On Sun, 31 May 2026 22:01:11 +0200, Arnaud de Prelle said:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As per
> - https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx/ and
> - 
> https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/36a3131d-5600-11f1-b339-3497f65b111b.html
> CVE-2026-9256 should be fixed since nginx 1.30.2,3.

The contents of this URL was stale -- the VuXML now says nginx < 1.31.1,3
(since yesterday), which explains why pkg audit is detecting it.

> I'm using the latest version of nginx:
> # pkg info nginx | grep Version
> Version        : 1.30.2_2,3
> 
> But pkg audit -F reports this port as vulnerable to CVE-2026-9256:
> # pkg audit -F
> vulnxml file up-to-date
> nginx-1.30.2_2,3 is vulnerable:
>    nginx -- heap buffer overflow in ngx_http_rewrite_module
>    CVE: CVE-2026-9256
>    WWW: 
> https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/36a3131d-5600-11f1-b339-3497f65b111b.html
> 
> Am I missing something ?

The VuXML looks wrong to me now.

nginx released both 1.30.2 and 1.31.1 to fix this CVE
(https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.30 and https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES).

__Martin


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202606011426.651EQMeV018896>