Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:48:35 +0100 From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-uboot@dino.sk> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org Subject: Re: u-boot for Zynq Zybo-Z7 board Message-ID: <20200120104835.60b872cc@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20200109125918.07da2be47103650577356b40@bidouilliste.com> References: <20190722143005.152779f3@zeta.dino.sk> <20190722174807.eb64f11514b20808ee6b4ca3@bidouilliste.com> <20190722193411.350ad34e@zeta.dino.sk> <20190722195039.c0ab5b4d756791115a9093c0@bidouilliste.com> <20200109115249.234ae93f@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109120844.e8819f5d6c7f9747e70a8baf@bidouilliste.com> <20200109121748.30d4b3af@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109124116.1dbe322144e14f61e695e3f5@bidouilliste.com> <20200109125006.647f593d@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109125918.07da2be47103650577356b40@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:59:18 +0100 Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:50:06 +0100 > Milan Obuch <freebsd-uboot@dino.sk> wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:41:16 +0100 > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:17:48 +0100 > > > Milan Obuch <freebsd-uboot@dino.sk> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:08:44 +0100 > > > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:54:02 +0100 > > > > > Milan Obuch <freebsd-uboot@dino.sk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:50:39 +0200 > > > > > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:34:11 +0200 > > > > > > > Milan Obuch <freebsd-uboot@dino.sk> wrote: > > > > [ snip ] > > > > > > > > New port is just submitted, see > > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243211 > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Milan > > > > > > > > > > I don't like having patches, do you plan to upstream the > > > > > change for board/xilinx/zynq/zynq-zybo-z7/ps7_init_gpl.c ? > > > > > For the defconfig patch, please use a fragment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both issues are reported upstream with patches suggested to fix > > > > them. I have no idea how long it takes for them to accept them. > > > > My mails are currently waiting in moderator's queue for > > > > approval. > > > > > > > > That being written, in my oppinion patches are good method to > > > > fix issue now for us, immediatelly, after fix is accepted > > > > upstream, they are simple to remove. > > > > > > I don't see any patch for zybo upstream, what is the patchwork > > > link? > > > > Issues were just reported today, messages are waiting for approval. > > I can't do anything at the moment. How could a patchwork be > > created? Can it do I or this needs to be done by upstream? > > It's created automatically when you submit a patch upstream. > Then you can use PATCHFILES+= <patchworkid>/raw in the makefile > instead of using a local patch. > After a while patches are in mainstream u-boot source tree, I modified my port to use them and uploaded new shar file to bugzilla. Binaries produced are tested on hardware with recent snapshot image from ftp, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-arm-armv7-GENERICSD-20200116-r356767.img.xz and boots OK. By the way, how could bug's assigne be changed from freebsd-ports-bugs to freebsd-uboot? I think this would be reasonable... Regards, Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200120104835.60b872cc>