Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:54:49 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scan_ffs for UFS2 Message-ID: <p05200f1aba7f0f3e7abc@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200302231540.20166.mranner@inode.at> References: <200302192220.12731.mranner@inode.at> <p05200f13ba7c4be9b16a@[128.113.24.47]> <200302231540.20166.mranner@inode.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 3:40 PM +0100 2/23/03, Michael Ranner wrote: >Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 Garance wrote: > > > > I don't know how find-sb compares to the program you're > > talking about, but they sound kind of similar. > >Scan_ffs can print the lost disklabel for use with disklabel(8). >Find-sb, that version from cvs, seems only to print info about >the superblocks of each file system and you have to rebuild the >lost disklabel for your self. [...] > >I don't know what find-sb could do with your patches applied. >If it's superior to scan_ffs, we can forget scan_ffs. It sounds like you should go with scan_ffs, and when I have the time to sort out my updates I'll see how they apply to that. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05200f1aba7f0f3e7abc>