Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:50:07 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 in world Message-ID: <3F324AFF.1070104@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3F2F8A5F.A17CABCA@mindspring.com> References: <3F2D1713.9060806@liwing.de> <20030803181735.GC6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <3F2EA5AD.E4C73C6@mindspring.com> <20030804184248.GA41334@crodrigues.org> <3F2F8A5F.A17CABCA@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> He apparently doesn't understand that v6/v4 NATs and proxy servers
> would let him deploy today ...assuming that the Windows stack was
> there.
What do you mean "the Windows stack was there"? XP supports IPv6, as
long as you install it, so I assume there's something missing *in* XP's
IPv6 support. What is it?
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
dcs@tcoip.com.br
Outros:
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net
I would rather say that a desire to drive fast
sports cars is what sets man apart from the animals.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F324AFF.1070104>