Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:07:06 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Cc:        Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: truss status
Message-ID:  <20060724130641.R44945@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060724072513.GB727@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References:  <200607210845.k6L8j0Ep026008@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ac6z4xu1.fsf@xps.des.no> <200607241228.56938.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200607241336.29993.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060724072513.GB727@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-Jul-24 13:36:19 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> Ktrace is almost useless "out of the box" because for any non-trivial 
>> operation you run out of requests.
>
> Some changes were made to improve this and this problem has mostly gone 
> away.

Mostly or entirely?  They were supposed to go entirely away :-).  If you have 
evidence to the contrary, a bug report would be much appreciated.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060724130641.R44945>