Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Mar 1997 23:25:14 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To:        Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>
Cc:        "matthew c. mead" <mmead@goof.com>, isp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: freebsd as a news server?
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.94.970309232108.6880E-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970309015111.22711A-100000@alpha.risc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Brian Tao wrote:

> On Sat, 8 Mar 1997, matthew c. mead wrote:
> >
> > I've got the striping factor set to 255 blocks (per a suggestion in
> > the docs for ccd).
> 
>     For a news server, a stripe size of 65536 blocks (32 megabytes)
> will give you optimal results, due to the mechanics of UFS's file and
> directory layout in a cylinder group (which by default is 32MB).  That
> ccd configuration will tend to localize all disk access related to
> reading a random file to a single drive in your array, thus allowing
> maximum concurrency across the RAID.  This is why having many smaller
> disks is better than having a few larger disks.
> --
> Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
> "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"
> 
> 
> 

  But isn't choosing block and fragment sizes very important as well?

  The default of 8192 and 1024 seems fast, but seems to be wasting space.
I remember Joe Greco mentioning something about disappointing file system
performance if these are messed with the wrong way.

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.94.970309232108.6880E-100000>