Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 10:23:22 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/23944: Proposed modification to ftpd Message-ID: <200101071723.f07HNMs32219@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 09:12:20 PST." <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A536F7C.71DA4C2E@colltech.com> <200101041351.KAA96373@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> <200101071701.f07H1Ts32049@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : I'll forward them to Luke. You were also one that wanted to see us use a : common ftpd. IMO we can loose a few of those features to get all the : features LukeFTPD gives us. Or is someone going to add the features to : our ftpd so that so many poeple can stop using wu-ftpd and proftpd -- we : know about their vunlerability records. I want a common ftpd. I'd like to see those features (at least the important ones) added to LukeFTPD. I use both the anonymous only and the read-only features on different machines. : > I had thought that my list of "features that we have now, but netbsd's : > ftpd doesn't have" was enough to slow that down. : : >1mo. is a slow down in my book. Ah. OK. I thought that was the original schedule. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101071723.f07HNMs32219>