Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 07 Jan 2001 10:23:22 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
To:        freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/23944: Proposed modification to ftpd 
Message-ID:  <200101071723.f07HNMs32219@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 09:12:20 PST." <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com> 
References:  <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com>  <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A536F7C.71DA4C2E@colltech.com> <200101041351.KAA96373@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> <200101071701.f07H1Ts32049@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010107091220.B94566@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes:
: I'll forward them to Luke.  You were also one that wanted to see us use a
: common ftpd.  IMO we can loose a few of those features to get all the
: features LukeFTPD gives us.  Or is someone going to add the features to
: our ftpd so that so many poeple can stop using wu-ftpd and proftpd -- we
: know about their vunlerability records.

I want a common ftpd.  I'd like to see those features (at least the
important ones) added to LukeFTPD.  I use both the anonymous only and
the read-only features on different machines.

: > I had thought that my list of "features that we have now, but netbsd's
: > ftpd doesn't have" was enough to slow that down.
: 
: >1mo. is a slow down in my book.

Ah.  OK.  I thought that was the original schedule.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101071723.f07HNMs32219>