Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 15:04:33 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <00042315043301.20614@nomad.dataplex.net> In-Reply-To: <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Nate Williams wrote: > > 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. > > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. Then why does the banner say "-STABLE" and why is it on the freebsd-stable mailing list? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00042315043301.20614>