Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:44:46 +0200 From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911123833.GA54483@freebsd.org> <848C813E-E6EC-4FAF-9374-B5583A077404@cederstrand.dk> <20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > Interest twist of history. GCC is not abandonware. Correct, but GCC 4.2.1 is. -- chs,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ>