Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC Message-ID: <m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not > sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard > it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the > critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving > the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port? i don't mind if dig, doc, et alia are not in base, as long as they are a separate port from the bind hippo. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy>