Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:47:08 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Cc:        Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Subject:   Re: Processes blocked on ufs or getblk 
Message-ID:  <16933.1075315628@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:46:20 %2B0100." <xzphdyf7vyb.fsf@dwp.des.no> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzphdyf7vyb.fsf@dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
 writes:
>"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>> If you are brave, you can try the patch at
>> 	http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ata.patch
>> which seems to fix this for me, but have not yet been approved by
>> sos@.
>
>This is not an ata issue.  There aren't even any ata drives in Robin's
>system.

Ok, then we have two problems...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16933.1075315628>