Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:12:51 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <20070831141251.GB79097@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <62415.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1188366366.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> References: <62415.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1188366366.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 07:46:06AM +0200, Bjrn Knig wrote: > what do you think about adding the CPU types "k9" and "k10"? No. K10 does not exist. (nor does K9 either). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070831141251.GB79097>