Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:48:54 -0700 From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <85E92030-93B9-4460-B522-2C56FD091CBD@netconsonance.com> In-Reply-To: <264183D1-4324-405D-B737-1555A6FFFCE7@khera.org> References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846D849.2090005@FreeBSD.org> <4846E14C.709@FreeBSD.org> <AC78CAC0-BA7C-4A20-9BEE-E7E37FD225E7@netconsonance.com> <48472CCF.8080101@FreeBSD.org> <7B3DA577-61F6-41D2-90B1-954E3A5A5C80@netconsonance.com> <264183D1-4324-405D-B737-1555A6FFFCE7@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: >> If you're asking why I don't turn a production environment over to >> being a freebsd-unstable-testbed, I can't really answer that >> question in a way you'd understand (if you were asking that question) On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Vivek Khera wrote: > If you don't have an identical setup to test new software, then > you're pretty much not able to ever upgrade anything, IMO, and your > "production" environment *is* a testbed for new software. You clipped the part where I said exactly the same thing, and also explained why it wasn't really useful for the problems named. Are you done getting off a random pot-shot? Interested in focusing on the real questions? -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85E92030-93B9-4460-B522-2C56FD091CBD>