Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 13:08:19 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/emulators/wine/files patch-dlls-wineoss.drv Message-ID: <20110515180819.GB29366@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110515155920.GB19328@FreeBSD.org> References: <201105140021.p4E0LlP7029193@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110514082018.GC97304@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1105150744430.28608@gerinyyl> <20110515155920.GB19328@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:59:20PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Carefully selected and reasonable defaults is one of the strong sides > of ports (and thus packages) that we offer, despite all aforementioned > drawbacks. User feedback at the last 2 conferences that I have been to, is that we are insufficiently consistent in our defaults. (In particular, X11 and CUPS are frequently mentioned as offenders; there are others.) This primarily affects our default-built packages. A post-BSDCan task for portmgr is to come up with recommendations on how to deal with this problem. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110515180819.GB29366>