Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 23:14:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271817] sed: range change with N results in no output Message-ID: <bug-271817-227-l97GA2kYGl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271817-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271817-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271817 --- Comment #6 from Mohamed Akram <mohd.akram@outlook.com> --- (In reply to Andrew "RhodiumToad" Gierth from comment #5) Thank you for this. > Alternatively, you (or GNU sed) may be assuming that "c" starts a new cyc= le (rather=20 > than executing the rest of the script) for every row of a 2-address range= , not just=20 > the last one. This isn't what the spec actually says (as you quoted yours= elf),=20 > though it might be considered to be more useful or consistent. (I looked = for=20 > applicable defect reports against the spec, didn't find any.) I now wonder if other implementations output bdf as expected. Might be worth opening a ticket against the spec to clarify this ambiguity. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271817-227-l97GA2kYGl>