Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:13:34 -0700
From:      Andrew Perkins <andrew@violet.org>
To:        Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Subject:   Re: circumventing ld default -L paths
Message-ID:  <20000605101333.A24367@violet.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000605070727.BBF259726@toad.stack.nl>; from marcov@stack.nl on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 09:07:27AM %2B0200
References:  <20000604202451.A12837@violet.org> <20000605070727.BBF259726@toad.stack.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 09:07:27AM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:

  marcov> > And finally, NO, I do not want to move the system library
  marcov> > in /usr/lib OR rename the library I am using (a modified
  marcov> > form of the same lib).
  marcov> > 
  marcov> > I cheerfully assume that this is easy and I am just
  marcov> > missing something.

  marcov> Rename one to libxxx-nonsense, and link agains xxx-nonsense
  marcov> instead of xxx

Yes, I understand that I could move /usr/lib/libfoo.a to
/usr/lib/libfoo-disabled.a, however that would not meet 'the
requirements'.  Please see above.  Where is the default ld link
path hardcoded?


Cordially,
_____________________________________________
Andrew Perkins              andrew@violet.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000605101333.A24367>