Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:51:00 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: cronopios@gmail.com, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, koma2@lovepeers.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <1136141460.14518.0.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060101191016.5efae084@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200601011543.k01Fhat3076426@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060101191016.5efae084@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 01. 01. 2006 v 19:10 +0200:
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
> Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
> > (5) The frequency of INDEX generation on official site is now
> > sufficient, recommend to run "portsdb -F" (fetch INDEX from official
> > site) instead of "portsdb -U" (make INDEX by yourself) in portsdb(1).
> > [1]
>
> > PR: ports/91164
> > Submitted by: KOMATSU Shinichiro <koma2@lovepeers.org>
> > (maintainer) Pointed out by: Enrique Matias <cronopios at gmail dot
> > com> [1]
>
> This is a very bad idea; locally generated INDEX contains all
> use-defined OPTIONS, etc. while the fetched one contains only the
> defaults thus his has the potential to break the wonderful
> upward-recursive usage of portupgrade.
How does it breaks upward recursive usage of portupgrade? The contents
of /var/db/pkg are used for that, not INDEX file.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
The use of the lavatory is restricted to the train's cat.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDuCSUntdYP8FOsoIRAgYuAKCxTSegmobQst0EBHZ2CcsO0MK7HwCfVApZ
PuRenUAC9sETj+Ojb19T78c=
=9z9p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1136141460.14518.0.camel>