Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:14:28 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> Cc: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allow user install Message-ID: <86hatxw4rf.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4FE9D84E.7080402@vangyzen.net> (Eric van Gyzen's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:42:06 -0500") References: <20120626063017.D05DA58081@chaos.jnpr.net> <86wr2uwdgf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <C31B93F4-674C-4183-9F3F-5F7C48980204@kientzle.com> <4FE9D84E.7080402@vangyzen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> writes: > Tim's idea sounds great, and would cover several use-cases. > Specifically, it leaves the build artifacts in the usual places so > other, later builds can build against them, whereas writing the > artifacts directly to a tar file does not. I'm not sure what you mean. The "build artifacts" would still be in the obj tree. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hatxw4rf.fsf>