Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 08:32:46 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why lagg(4) wants ~IFF_DRV_OACTIVE? Message-ID: <20100308193246.GB38183@citylink.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <4B954C19.9050606@delphij.net> References: <4B954C19.9050606@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Xin LI wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Maybe this is a stupid question but I really don't understand why a > interface with IFF_DRV_OACTIVE can't be added to a lagg(4) interface. > Looking at OpenBSD code, they do this since the day 0. > > Could anyone shed some light, why we need to enforce this check? :) I think it was just carried over, I dont see any reason to keep it. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100308193246.GB38183>