Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:13 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in Message-ID: <479B6051.3010205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk> References: <200801240236.m0O2awrw054388@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080124181741.GA37539@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <4798F0E3.1030401@FreeBSD.org> <20080124202623.GA46809@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <47993265.2030603@FreeBSD.org> <20080125215714.GA78140@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <479A71F4.2060106@FreeBSD.org> <20080126075440.GA97125@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Well, you wrote that the commit log contained information on why you
> did this... Since this must be considered pretty non-standard (as far
> as I can tell, no other ports have this requirement), I'm quite
> curious as to why this was needed.
I think we've reached a language barrier here, since all you've done is
repeat your request for an explanation without actually telling me why
this is so important to you that you've invested so much energy into
poking me about something that cannot possibly affect you in any way.
So, if you can tell me what your actual concerns are, I can try to
expand my explanation to address them.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479B6051.3010205>