Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:30:21 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187475 - head/usr.bin/make Message-ID: <497AEDBD.20603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090120171803.GA37717@freebsd.org> References: <200901201715.n0KHFCfw051198@svn.freebsd.org> <20090120171803.GA37717@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Divacky wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:15:12PM +0000, Roman Divacky wrote: >> Author: rdivacky >> Date: Tue Jan 20 17:15:12 2009 >> New Revision: 187475 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187475 >> >> Log: >> Remove inlining of functions that are used mostly in different object files. >> This gets rid of gnu89 style inlining. Also silence gcc by assigning two >> variables NULL. This lets use to remove NO_WERROR. > > does anyone know of some Makefile that is cpu intensive and not io bound? > it might make sense to turn on -finline-functions in make but it would > be nice to be able to measure the speedup (if any)... > > do we have some funny stuff written bsd make ? (computation of PI or > something like that) Look at the /usr/ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/makeparallel script. This generates an enormous makefile from a port INDEX, and parsing it takes some time. Rerunning this with the makefile in cache might be a test case for make(1) performance. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?497AEDBD.20603>