Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:05:30 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/ifc8 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc8/files assert_fail.c cxa_atexit.c cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c exclude exclude_noportdocs ld.c linux_file.c linux_stat.c mcount.S ... Message-ID: <20040121.000530.719892310.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040119165825.4aa630a8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200401191452.i0JEqDsi040194@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119150116.GC28508@FreeBSD.org> <20040119165825.4aa630a8@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Alex, > It's v8 of Intels Fortran Compiler (ifc). v7 is already in the tree. He > follows my leading with icc, but I requested a repo copy of icc to icc7 > whereas he just added the ifc8 port. yes. > I suggest to remove the port and let cvs@ do a repo copy of ifc to ifc7. No. I would like to wait for several months or so, since ifc8 is still inmature state. higaki-san reported several defects of ifc8, and he don't want to recommend to use as a primary fortran compiler. Anyway, ifc8 is not very well tested, and ifc7 is quite tested. so in the meantime, I don't think we need to do repo copy. > The commit message should also have a note about using copies of large > parts of the icc port. I haven't looked at the files yet, but just from You are right. we should acknowledge your hard works. I've done as forced commit. > looking at the commit log there may be something wrong with it, > cxa_finalize.c isn't needed anymore as the entire DSO support is in > cxa_atexit.c now (it has the same line count as the icc one). Committed. thank you very much. Regards, maho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040121.000530.719892310.chat95>